by
Richard Hellmann |
BC WATER NEWS
NEW
ORLEANS — A
coalition of scientists, engineers and technical experts laid out
a bold and visionary proposal
June 1 to restore the Louisiana coast,
an effort that hinges on a $2 billion authorization bill as part
of the Water Resources Development Act being debated in Congress.
The
focal point of the massive plan would create channels along the
Mississippi
River between Myrtle Grove and Venice, collecting
the 120 million tons of sediment lost each year to the Gulf of
Mexico and using it to rebuild, replenish and sustain the state’s
southeastern coast. Without sediment, the coastal marsh subsides
and erodes, falling off the Gulf shelf and becoming open water.
These
vanishing wetlands — most notably Plaquemines
Parish — are
the first line of defense against Mother Nature, and the coalition
used the first day of the 2006 hurricane season to remind everyone
of the urgency to repair this delicate but collapsing ecosystem.
“Without aggressive action to restore its coast, the future
is bleak for Louisiana,” Denise Reed, an environmental sciences
professor at the University of New Orleans and head of the technical
group, said in a prepared statement.
“Even if we can protect populated areas from hurricanes
with levees and floodgates, the continued loss of the coastal landscape
will pose an increasing threat to the economy and environment of
the region,” she said. “Land loss and flooding will
become even more severe as sea-level rise accelerates and storms
increase in intensity.”
"Without
aggressive action to restore its coast, the future
is bleak for Louisiana."
Denise
Reed
|
Redirecting the main flow of sediment and fresh water from the
Mississippi River closer to shore would allow tides and waves to
transport the sediment and rework it into a mosaic of wetlands,
shallow bays and barrier islands, the scientists say. Of course,
this is a costly and time-consuming approach, but one that Reed
believes is vital.
Vince Neary, an associate professor of civil and environmental
engineering at Tennessee Tech University, says the state's coastal
wetlands act as natural speed bumps against hurricanes and storm
surges. Mining and diverting sediments on a smaller scale would
slow land loss, but would not sustain the landscape, the report
emphasizes.
"If you really are serious, that's how dramatic the plan
has to be," Neary said in a university press release. "Itsy-bitsy
fixes won't cut it anymore."
His colleagues in the technical group agree.
“A lot of proposals are out there that are less radical,
but they’re small” says Bill Dawson, P.E. “They’re
not fast enough or good enough. The river solution is a massive
project, to get a deep channel all the way to the Gulf. It’s
going to take some time to do that.”
The
technical group’s report helped sort out the priorities
for coastal Louisiana, Dawson says. “Technical solutions
are fairly easy to come up with, but implementing them will be
the difficult part.”
Mike
Fowler, P.E., a water resources engineer, agrees with the technical
group’s solution. “It’ll work as long
as the navigation for the Mississippi River is adequate and maintained,” he
says. “I’d be surprised if there’s significant
support for an approach that doesn’t support navigation.
“We’ve interrupted a natural process … of the
coastal land area, and have accelerated the loss of these areas.
We have to somehow reinstitute the land-building process that’s
been interrupted.”
A
new storm of debate is likely over navigation, though, as the
U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers prepares to study closing “hurricane
highway” to ships.
The
group’s
report outlines three scenarios: