Want to subscribe to the SoCal Water Resources News?  We cover it all, every day:  Water, waste- water, flood control, and coastal water quality.
It's free!

Visit our subscription site at:

www.bcwaternews.com/
socalh2onews

Or, simply e-mail the editor at kharlow@cox.net with your name, title, and agency.

See also the latest on:

Brown and Caldwell
16735 Von Karman,  Suite 200
Irvine, CA 92606
(949) 260-6152 phone
(949) 474-0940 fax





Congress Hears Conflicting Testimony Regarding SRF Funding Levels
  • WEF notification
    March 1, 2002

A bill to substantially raise the amounts of clean and safe drinking water state revolving loan funds received varying degrees of support this week as EPA, states, local elected officials, and other interest groups testified before and the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee.

Ben Grumbles, EPA Deputy Assistant Administrator for Water, said the Administration supports the goals of S.1961, the Water Investment Act of 2002, but had concerns on the amount of the funding increase. "The President clearly defined his priorities in the State of the Union as defense and homeland security ... the increased spending called for in this bill is not consistent with those priorities," said Grumbles. The bill would authorize $35 billion for water and wastewater infrastructure over five years through the current SRF with some additional administrative adjustments to the programs. Grumbles said the Administration is also concerned about provisions in the bill that would expand the scope of projects eligible for SRF funding and that the expansion may have the effect of taking away resources from core water and wastewater infrastructure issues. Grumbles did say the Administration supported other provisions in the bill, including allowing the transfer of funds between the clean water SRF and the safe drinking water SRF and vice-versa, and provisions promoting technology innovation.

The second day of the hearing focused on testimony from municipal water and wastewater agencies including Paul Pinault, Executive Director of the Narragansett Bay Commission. While EPA did not support the levels of funding in the bill, Pinault said the bill falls short of the $57 billion over the next five years recommended by the Water Infrastructure Network to address core infrastructure investments. Pinault, testifying on behalf of the Association of Metropolitan Sewerage Agencies, said Congress should recognize the need for grants to local communities in S. 1961.

The Senate is expected to move quickly to approve S. 1961 out of committee and on to the floor for a vote. On the House side, a similar bill by the Transportation and Infrastructure Committee is expected to be introduced next week with a hearing scheduled for March 13. The full text of the S.1961 and testimony from both hearings before the Environment and Public Works Committee is available at:

http://www.senate.gov/~epw/stm1_107.htm

 

NOTICE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C., section 107, some material is provided without permission from the copyright owner, only for purposes of criticism, comment, scholarship and research under the "fair use" provisions of federal copyright laws. These materials may not be distributed further, except for "fair use," without permission of the copyright owner.